It is said there are six degrees of separation between all of us, but the link between Drew Peterson and Greg Long is downright uncanny.
Long believes the connection is so remarkably significant, that he made a plea for help after realizing the coincidence.
Long and Peterson now are both behind bars. Both men are fighting murder charges. And the lives of both men could come down to what one man had to say. That person is forensic pathologist, Dr. Bryan R. Mitchell.
Mitchell is the man who, for Will County, performed the original autopsy on Peterson's third wife, Kathleen Savio. On March 1, 2004, Savio was found dead at her home in a waterless bathtub, soaked in blood. After examining her body, it was in Mitchell's opinion, that Savio's death could be "ascribed to drowning."
Based partly on Mitchell's autopsy of Savio, a coroner's jury determined her death to be an accidental drowning.
After the disappearance of Peterson's fourth wife in October of 2007, Will County authorities approved the exhumation of Savio's body, so that it could undergo a second autopsy. That second autopsy led to a far different conclusion about Savio's death, and the case was reclassified a homicide. On May 7, 2009, Peterson was indicted by a Will County Grand Jury and charged with Savio's murder. He's now in the Will County Jail, where he awaits trial.
____________________________
- Hearsay Law Under Fire by Drew Peterson
- Exclusive Raw Video: Drew Peterson Arrest
- Drew Peterson's Would-Be Hit Man
____________________________
GREG LONG'S STORY
Greg Long, on the other hand, has been locked up for almost nine years. At the Hill Correctional Center, a medium security state prison in Galesburg, Illinois, Long is known as inmate R-1-4-0-0-3.
He was found guilty of murdering one his best friends on October 25, 2000. But all this time, he stood behind the belief that his trial had been flawed by a major error in the autopsy. That autopsy was performed by Dr. Bryan R. Mitchell.
Jobless and homeless, Long says he was living in an abandoned truck in Joliet, with his friend David Henker back in the fall of 2000. He says their day usually consisted of heavy drugs and alcohol.
He says he found Henker dead after a night of wild partying together. He recounted his story in a soft but determined voice, on a steamy July day, inside the office of the director of the Hill Correctional Center. For Long, our interview represented a chance for his to tell his side once and for all.
"Did you have any reason to kill him?" I asked. "No. I sure didn't," quickly responded Long without any hesitation or uncertainty in his reply. Then came the follow-up question: "How do you think he died?" "Overdose on alcohol or drugs," stated Long in a matter of fact fashion.
Henker's autopsy did indeed detect cocaine in his system as well as a blood alcohol level of .446, more than five times the legal limit. But Henker's body was badly burned, because their truck cab had caught fire. The deep bruises on Henker's neck led Dr. Mitchell to conclude Henker was strangled. On the other hand, the fingernail scrapings collected from Long, the day after Henker death, failed to detect any evidence of DNA from Henker.
When Long was arrested, he had a train ticket with him from Joliet to Pontiac in the name of Tom Donnelly. He says it was only after he was taken into custody that he learned their truck cab had caught fire. He speculates that a candle, which he says they had used to light the crack they smoked throughout the day of Henker's death, somehow set the truck cab ablaze.
If you believe Long's story, that he's an innocent man, who had no reason to kill David Henker, then how do you explain the bruises found on his neck? During trial, Dr. Shaku Teas, a pathologist who testified on behalf on Long, cast blame directly at the feet of Dr. Mitchell. She stated his autopsy procedure were faulty and his conclusions were incorrect. She concluded Henker died as a result of alcohol poisoning, and in her opinion, the manner in which Dr. Mitchell performed Henker's autopsy actually created those bruises on his neck.
"What is wrong with the procedure?" Long's attorney asked Dr. Teas, according to excerpts of the trial obtained by Fox Chicago News. Her response: "Just as I said, especially if you are trying to diagnose strangulation, blood from the neck organs should be drained, because once you have caused an artificial hemorrhage, because even as you are cutting, you are cutting the skin away from the muscle you are cutting the little veins and vessels. Those vessels will leak. Once you have caused that kind of hemorrhage, then it becomes very difficult to say which is the real hemorrhage and which is an artificial hemorrhage."
For a second opinion, we reached out to renowned pathologist and Fox News contributor, Dr. Michael Baden. (Baden coincidentally performed the second autopsy on Kathleen Savio, at the request of the Savio

